- Templates
- Delivery
- Client Management
- Project Management
Free RACI Matrix Template for Software Projects
A free RACI matrix template (Excel) for software projects, plus what RACI stands for, responsible vs accountable, a worked example, and the rules.
· 8 min read

Many project delays don't come from hard technical problems. They come from a simpler question nobody answered at the start: who decides? Who approves the design? Who signs off a release? Who needs to be asked before the database changes, and who only needs to hear about it afterwards?
A RACI matrix answers those questions on one page, and we use one on our projects. This guide explains what RACI means, shows a RACI matrix example for a typical software project, and includes a free Excel template you can copy.
What is a RACI matrix?
A RACI matrix (also called a RACI chart or a responsibility assignment matrix) is a table that lists a project's tasks or decisions in rows and the people or roles in columns. Each cell says who is Responsible for doing the work, who is Accountable for the result, who is Consulted before it's done, and who is Informed after.
What does RACI stand for?
RACI is an acronym for the four ways a person can be involved in a task:
| Letter | Role | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| R | Responsible | Does the work. There can be more than one. |
| A | Accountable | Owns the outcome and gives the final approval. Only one per task. |
| C | Consulted | Gives input before or during the work. Two-way communication. |
| I | Informed | Is kept up to date on progress or the result. One-way communication. |
The PMBOK Guide from the Project Management Institute calls this kind of table a responsibility assignment matrix (RAM), and RACI is the most common format of it.
Responsible vs accountable: what's the difference?
This is where most confusion comes from.
- Responsible people do the work. A developer is responsible for building a feature.
- The accountable person answers for the result. They review it, make the final call, and are the one who has to explain if it goes wrong. On a feature, that's often the tech lead or the project manager, depending on what is being decided.
A simple test: if the task fails, who has to explain why? That's the accountable person. Several people can be responsible, but only one person should be accountable. Two accountable people usually means nobody is.
On small teams, one person is often both responsible and accountable for a task. That's fine, as long as it's written down.
RACI matrix example for a software development project
Here is an example for a typical client project with a small delivery team. The roles are columns, the key activities are rows. For an in-house product team, replace the Client column with the product manager or product owner.
| Activity | Client | PM | Tech lead | Developers | QA | Designer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business requirements | A | R | C | I | I | C |
| User stories and acceptance criteria | C | A/R | C | C | C | C |
| UI/UX design | A | C | C | I | I | R |
| Estimates and timeline | C | A | R | C | C | C |
| Technical architecture | I | I | A/R | C | I | I |
| Development | I | I | A | R | C | C |
| Code review | – | – | A | R | – | – |
| QA testing | I | I | C | C | A/R | – |
| User acceptance testing (UAT) | A/R | R | I | I | C | I |
| Release approval | A | R | C | I | C | I |
| Deployment to production | I | I | A | R | C | – |
| Weekly status report | I | A/R | C | I | I | I |
| Change requests | A | R | C | I | I | C |
A few things to notice:
- The client is accountable for business decisions (requirements, design approval, UAT, release approval) because it's their product. The team advises; the client decides.
- The tech lead is accountable for technical decisions (architecture, code quality, deployment), even when developers do the work.
- The project manager is accountable for the delivery process (scope, timeline, status reporting) and is responsible for moving business decisions forward with the client.
Your matrix will look different. That's the point: the useful part isn't the letters, it's the conversation you have while agreeing on them. If you need help with the requirements rows, I've written separately about writing user stories and acceptance criteria, and about what UAT involves.
How to create a RACI matrix
- List the activities and decisions. Focus on the ones where confusion is likely: approvals, sign-offs, releases, changes. You don't need a row for every small task.
- List the roles. Use roles (Tech lead, QA) rather than names where you can, so the matrix still works when people change.
- Assign one A per row first. Decide who owns each outcome before anything else.
- Add the R's. Who actually does the work?
- Add C's and I's sparingly. Only people whose input is needed, and only people who really need the update.
- Check the rows and columns using the rules below.
- Review it with the team and the client, then share it. A RACI matrix only works if everyone has agreed to it.
The best time to do this is at the start of the project. I cover it as part of the project kickoff meeting.
RACI matrix rules
For each row (activity):
- Exactly one A. No A means no owner; two A's means confusion.
- At least one R. Someone has to do the work.
- Not too many C's. Every C is someone who has to be asked, which adds time.
For each column (role):
- A role with many A's and R's may be overloaded. Check whether that person really has the time.
- A role with no A's or R's may not need to be in the matrix at all.
- A role with only I's might be fine with the weekly status update instead.
Common RACI mistakes
- Making everyone "Consulted". It feels inclusive, but it slows every decision down.
- Two accountable people for one task. For example, the client and the PM both "approving" the release. Decide who has the final word.
- Creating it and never opening it again. Revisit it when the team changes or a new phase starts.
- Using it instead of talking. RACI clarifies roles. It doesn't replace the weekly meeting, the written decisions, or a direct conversation when something is unclear.
RACI vs RASCI, DACI, and RAPID
RACI is the most common model, but there are variants:
| Model | Roles | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| RACI | Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed | Tasks and deliverables across a project |
| RASCI | RACI plus Supportive: people who help the responsible person (for example, providing resources) | Larger teams where support roles need to be visible |
| DACI | Driver, Approver, Contributors, Informed | Single decisions. Atlassian's DACI play describes the Approver as the one person who makes the decision |
| RAPID | Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, Decide | Complex organisational decisions. Created by Bain & Company |
For most software projects, a simple RACI is enough. If the debate is about one specific decision (which tech stack, which vendor), DACI is often clearer.
Free RACI matrix template (Excel)
Download the RACI matrix template (.xlsx) · Preview what's inside
It includes:
- the software project example above, ready to edit,
- dropdowns for R, A, C, I, and A/R in every cell,
- an automatic check on every row: it flags rows with no A, more than one A, or no R,
- a summary per role that counts A's and R's, so overloaded roles stand out.
It works in Excel and in Google Sheets (File → Import → Upload).
Frequently asked questions
What does RACI stand for?
RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. Responsible people do the work, the accountable person owns the result and approves it, consulted people give input before or during the work, and informed people are kept up to date on progress or the outcome.
What is the golden rule of RACI?
Exactly one accountable person per task or decision. Two accountable people is the most common RACI mistake. With two, each can assume the other is handling it, and disagreements have no tie-breaker. If two people must agree, make one accountable and the other consulted.
Can the same person be responsible and accountable?
Yes. On small teams this is common, for example a tech lead who designs the architecture and also owns that decision. Many teams write it as "A/R". What matters is that every task still has exactly one accountable person.
What is the difference between RACI and RASCI?
RASCI adds an S for Supportive: people who help the responsible person do the work, for example by providing access, resources, or specialist help, without owning the task. It's useful on larger teams where support work would otherwise be invisible.
What is the main benefit of a RACI chart?
Clarity about ownership. Everyone can see who does the work, who makes the final decision, who must be asked, and who only needs an update. That prevents duplicated work, missed approvals, and the delays that come from waiting for a decision nobody knew they owned.
Is RACI outdated?
No, but it isn't the only option. RACI is still the most widely used responsibility model. Some teams use DACI or RAPID for individual decisions, and agile teams often keep RACI light, covering only approvals and sign-offs. Nothing has replaced it; the alternatives complement it.
When should you create a RACI matrix?
At the start of the project, ideally during or right after the kickoff, and before the first approval is needed. Update it when the team changes, when a new phase starts, or when the same "who decides?" question keeps coming up.
Is there a RACI template for Google Sheets?
Yes. The free Excel template on this page also works in Google Sheets: open Google Sheets, choose File, then Import, and upload the file. The dropdowns and the automatic row checks carry over.
Final thoughts
A RACI matrix is one of the simplest project tools there is. Its value isn't the table itself. It's the moment early in the project when everyone agrees who decides what, before the first disagreement makes the question urgent.
Related: Why Software Projects Get Delayed and How I Track 10 Projects at Once.